Introduction
Astrocytes are the most abundant non-neuronal, highly differentiated cells that span the entire central nervous system (CNS) (Tower and Young, 1973). They have many important physiological functions in the CNS, including maintaining extracellular ion, transmitter and fluid balance, regulating blood flow, influencing synaptic plasticity and contributing to many other essential functions (Nedergaard et al., 2003; Seifert et al., 2006; Pellerin et al., 2007). Astrocytes are classified into different subtypes principally based on their locations and functions. Fibrous astrocytes populate the white matter and encompass of dense glial filaments with cylindrical processes. Protoplasmic astrocytes reside in the gray matter with fewer glial filaments and irregular processes in comparison (Vaughn and Pease, 1967). In contrast, radial astroglia are the Bergmann glia in cerebellum and Müller cell in retina (Molofsky et al., 2012).
Astrocytosis is a pathological process involved in excessive generation of astrocytes in response to CNS damages following trauma and in different neurological diseases. Because of destruction to the brain-blood barrier, leakage of serum and plasma, increased inflammatory reactions (such as activation of microglia and generation of various cytokines), and enhanced activation of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) and SMAD2 signaling pathways, CNS injuries usually induce proliferation and migration of reactive astrocytes (RAs) at and around injury site and thus an increase in their number. Reactive astrocytes often exhibit characteristic structural changes, including marked hypertrophy and substantial overlap of astrocytic domains (Karimi-Abdolrezaee and Billakanti, 2012). Reactive astrocytes highly upregulate a large number of molecules, including different intermediate filaments, nestin, signaling proteins and many other molecules (Ridet et al., 1997; Sofroniew, 2009). In addition to the featured reactive astrocytes around lesion, injury site consists of NG2-expressing glia (including oligodendrocyte precursor cells), meningeal and vascular derived fibroblasts, pericytes, ependymal cells and phagocytic macrophages (Cregg et al., 2014).
Astrogliosis may result in both beneficial and maladaptive effects mainly depending on its time course and dynamic features (Sofroniew, 2014). Reactive astrogliosis occurs after various CNS lesions, including spinal cord injury (SCI). The primary benefits of glial scars include separation of inflammation of injury area from the intact tissues and minimize the extent of secondary damage after CNS injury. Several studies demonstrated that elimination of astrogliosis early after CNS injury resulted in greater lesion area and worse functional outcomes (Bush et al., 1999; Sofroniew, 2009; Burda and Sofroniew, 2014; Anderson et al., 2016). In response to injury, local naïve astrocytes (NAs) display sequential changes in phenotypes, initially as RAs and then as scar-forming astrocytes (SAs) (Bushong et al., 2002; Wilhelmsson et al., 2006). In contrast to individual, finely branched processes of NAs, which occupy non-overlapping domains, RAs are distinguished by hypertrophy of cell body and overlap of processes. At acute stage after CNS injury, RAs have various beneficial effects because the overlapped processes of RAs and incorporation of newly proliferated cells around the lesion separate damaged areas from healthy tissues and limit the spread of inflammatory cells (Faulkner et al., 2004; Herrmann et al., 2008). At subacute phase (4–14 days after SCI in mouse model), migrated RAs to the lesion epicenter isolate inflammatory cells and repair the lesion area for functional enhancement (Okada et al., 2006). However, at chronic phase (> 14 days after SCI in mice), RAs gradually convert into SAs and form scarring tissues, the major barrier for CNS axon regeneration (Silver and Miller, 2004; Pekny and Nilsson, 2005; Karimi-Abdolrezaee and Billakanti, 2012; Ohtake and Li, 2015).
With various genetic approaches, a group recently reported the determining role of environmental conditions for reactive astrocytes (Hara et al., 2017). Isolated RAs from injured spinal cord reverted to NAs when transplanted into non-injured spinal cord, while formed SAs when transplanted into injured spinal cord. Moreover, pharmacologically blocking interactions between type I collagen and its integrin receptor prevented astrocytic scar formation and improved axonal regrowth and functional recovery. Astrogliosis has long been considered a major barrier to axon regeneration, although RAs are able to support neurite extension under certain conditions and corticospinal axons could sprout in adult injured spinal cord during reactive gliosis (Li and Raisman, 1995; Sivron and Schwartz, 1995). The recent advance in better understanding molecular control of scar genesis may lead to development of new approaches for overcoming scar-based regeneration failure.
Gene Expression Profile and Marker Proteins in Various Subtypes of Astrocytes after SCI
It is extremely important to identify the gene expression profile and molecular markers for various subtypes of astroglia, including NAs, RAs and Sas (Ridet et al., 1997). Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) has been recognized as an astrocyte specific intermediate filament (IF) protein necessary for maintaining CNS function and blood-brain barrier integrity (Liedtke et al., 1996; Kakinuma et al., 1998). A great number of studies have employed GFAP as a primary marker for astrocytic scars by detection of its immunoreactivity. Before altering expression of various other proteins, reactive glia upregulate the IF proteins GFAP, vimentin and nestin (Eddleston and Mucke, 1993; Hernandez et al., 2002), which contribute to IF network formation (Barrett et al., 1981). Mice deficient in GFAP showed reduced IF formation and altered neuronal activities (Pekny et al., 1995; McCall et al., 1996). Astrogliosis appeared normal after CNS injuries in GFAP–/– or vimentin–/– mice, but deletion of both significantly impaired scar formation frequently accompanied by bleeding around the lesion (Pekny et al., 1999).
Several groups studied the gene expression profiling of purified astrocyte populations and made progress in revealing potential new markers (Doyle et al., 2008; Fu et al., 2009; Rowitch and Kriegstein, 2010), including identification of Aldh1L1 and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor 3 as the markers (Pringle et al., 2003; Cahoy et al., 2008). However, Okada's group further characterized the gene expression profile in different subtypes of astrocytes and defined the potential use of some genes as respective markers (Hara et al., 2017). It is crucial to distinguish diffident subtypes of astrocytes (NAs, RAs and SAs). As a conventional method, histological analysis has long been used to differentiate them. Because both RAs and SAs express various hallmark proteins (such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), nestin, β-catenin, N-cadherin and sex determining region Y-box 9 (SOX9)) and their expression levels are highly dynamic with time, it is difficult to differentiate them primarily based on histological analysis of characteristic expression (Cregg et al., 2014). Many groups also employed fluorescence activated cell sorting and translating ribosomal affinity purification to analyze cell types after separating solid organ tissues into individual cells (Doyle et al., 2008; Kumamaru et al., 2012). In contrast, by using laser microdissection combined with immunohistochemistry, Hara et al. (2017) selectively isolated NAs, RAs and SAs from contused mouse spinal cord at different stages and recognized clear distinctions among three astrocyte subtypes based on the expression profile of marker genes (Figure 1). Because of the graded continuum of gene expression and structural alterations during astrogliosis, it seems advantageous to combine marker gene profiling and morphological definitions for identifying various astrocyte phenotypes (Yokota et al., 2015; Hara et al., 2017).
Several genes are appropriate as the RA markers, including nestin (a type VI IF protein), Ctnnb1 (a gene encoding β-catenin), Plaur (encoding urokinase receptor, also known as urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor, uPAR), MMP2 (encoding matrix metalloproteinase 2), MMP13 (encoding matrix metalloproteinase 13) and Axin2 (also known as axin-like protein) (Hara et al., 2017). Plaur binds both precursor and mature forms of urokinase plasminogen activator and activates the receptor-bound pro-enzyme by plasmin, including the matrix metalloproteinases, thus promoting cell-surface plasminogen activation, plasmin formation and degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules. RAs upregulate GFAP, nestin, vimentin and Ctnnb1 comparing to NAs, but out of these 4 genes, only Ctnnb1 and nestin are suitable gene markers for RAs because SAs also upregulate GFAP and vimentin. Comparing to both NAs and SAs, RAs also uniquely upregulate Plaur, MMP2 and MMP13 and Axin2 (a negative feedback regulator for β-catenin). Therefore, the six genes of nestin, Ctnnb1, Plaur, MMP2, MMP13 and Axin2 are selectively expressed by RAs and may serve as the RA specific markers (Figure 1).
In addition to serving as the RA marker, β-catenin related genes appear important to mediate RA migration in the lesioned spinal cord (Hara et al., 2017). The highly expressed β-catenin in cytosol could bind T cell factory lymphoid enhancer factor (Tcf/Lef) and form the protein complex, which increases expression of uPAR (Lengyel et al., 1996). Upregulation of uPAR then accelerates cell surface plasmin formation, results in extracellular matrix proteolysis by activating MMPs (Ellis et al., 1991), and thus regulates migration of cells, including RAs. RA migration appears essential for promoting tissue repair and functional recovery after SCI (Okada et al., 2006).
Comparing to NAs and RAs, SAs selectively upregulate SOX9, N-cadherin (also known as cadherin-2 and CDH2), and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG) related genes (Xylt1, Chst11, Csgalnact1, Acan and Pcan). SOX9 is expressed as a HMG box transcription factor by neural stem cells in embryonic spinal cord (Molofsky et al., 2012) and its deletion in conditional knockout mice by nestin-Cre predisposed to extend neurogenesis period and to delay gliogenesis onset in developing spinal cord (Stolt et al., 2003). SOX9 upregulates CSPGs in astrocyte cultures and conditional SOX9 deletion promotes axon regrowth by reducing CSPG levels (Gris et al., 2007). CSPGs encompass a diverse group of extracellular matrix proteins (i.e., neurocan, aggrecan, brevican, versican, phosphocan, and NG2) and experience posttranslational alterations with complex glycosaminoglycan chains differing in sulfation patterns and length (Margolis and Margolis, 1994). CSPGs could block axon elongation during development and after CNS injury (Brittis et al., 1992; Wu et al., 1998). SOX9 deficiency downregulated certain chondroitin sulfate synthesizing enzymes, such as Xylt1/2 and C4st1 (McKillop et al., 2013; Takeuchi et al., 2013). SOX9 deletion also increased immunoreactivity puncta for synaptophysin several weeks after SCI and enhanced synaptic reconnections, resulting in improved recovery (McKillop et al., 2013). Therefore, upregulation of SOX9 by SAs probably correlates with axon growth failure mediated by CSPG overexpression after SCI.
Slit2, a repellant axon guidance cue, may also be a proper SA marker gene. Slit proteins are generally repulsive for axon growth and are essential for axon guidance and cell migration (Hagino et al., 2003; Silver and Miller, 2004). Slits are elevated along with their receptors (such as glypican1) after cortical injury (Ronca et al., 2001). Among them, Slit2 is co-localized with its receptor glypican1 in the spinal cord, hippocampus and cortex, and functions as a chemorepellent for hippocampal and spinal motor axons by binding glypican 1 with high affinity (Brose et al., 1999; Liang et al., 1999). Co-expression of Slit2 with glypican1 in the scar tissues indicates their potential molecular interactions after CNS injury (Hara et al., 2017).
Lesion Environment Determines Astrocytic Fate and Scar Formation after SCI
Both extracellular and intrinsic factors are important in controlling axon growth failure after CNS injury in adult mammals (Silver and Miller, 2004; Liu et al., 2011). For the former, an inhibitory environment due to scar formation at lesion site is critical for regenerative failure (Fawcett, 2006). However, the overall roles of reactive astrogliosis are complicated and reactive astrocytes may have numerous beneficial functions. Scar tissues have repairing roles after CNS damage by generating many ECM components with growth-promoting properties, such as fibronectin and laminin (Silver and Miller, 2004). In addition to acting as an accommodating bridging support for regeneration, RAs express polysialylated neuronal cell adhesion molecule and facilitate axon growth by interacting with other positive molecules, such as L1 (Aubert et al., 1995; Rutishauser and Landmesser, 1996). Astrocytes and other cell types around lesion have been reported to promote axon regrowth after SCI (Kawaja and Gage, 1991; Fawcett and Asher, 1999).
Migration of a great number of astrocytes into and around the lesion areas and formation of scar tissues create both physical and chemical barriers of axon regeneration. Importantly, upregulation of suppressing substances, particularly CSPGs, strongly blocks neural repair and axon regeneration. The inhibitory properties of reactive astrocytes develop with time after injury. A great number of studies demonstrate the potent suppression of axon regrowth by glial scar sourced inhibitors (McKeon et al., 1991; Davies et al., 1997; Ohtake and Li, 2015). Adult sensory neurons robustly regenerated their axons after micro-transplantation into intact white matter tracts by minimizing scar genesis, but failed to regrowth when approaching lesioned region with scar tissues (Silver and Miller, 2004). Digestion of the glycosaminoglycan side chains by chondroitinase ABC (ChABC) improves axon regeneration and sprouting after various CNS injuries (Bradbury et al., 2002; Alilain et al., 2011). Creation of a permissive environment around the lesion by combined peripheral nerve autographs, acidic fibroblast growth factor, and chondroitinase ABC (ChABC) enhanced recovery of urination and respiratory functions after SCI (Alilain et al., 2011; DePaul et al., 2015).
Reactive astrogliosis is reversible under certain conditions and local environment plays a major role in determining the fate of astrocytes in situ. The molecular mechanisms for astrocytic scar formation are not well known in spite of increased number of studies in this field. To further elucidate the molecular control of astrogliosis, Hara et al. (2017) transplanted isolated green fluorescent protein (GFP)-positive NAs from primary cultures into uninjured or contusively-injured spinal cord in mice and characterized the morphological and gene expression changes of NAs at 7 and 14 days after transplantation. Surprisingly, NAs exhibited the properties and marker gene expression of RAs at 7 days and of SAs at 14 days after transplantation into the injured spinal cord. In contrast, the grafted NAs into uninjured spinal cord remained unchanged in morphology and gene expression profile. Moreover, isolated GFP-positive RAs showed properties of SAs by upregulating SA marker genes 7 days after transplantation into injured spinal cord, but reverted back to NAs with suppressed SA gene expressions 7 days after transplantation into uninjured spinal cord.
Upregulation of type 1 collagen (Col 1) and N-cadherin around the lesion plays important roles in astrogliosis. Because activated astrocytes upregulated various cell surface molecules, including ECM molecules and cell adhesion molecules (Aubert et al., 1995; Merrill and Benveniste, 1996), Hara et al. (2017) further determined the expression levels of these genes around lesion by Gene Ontology term analysis and detected enhanced ECM genes 14 days after SCI, especially Col 1 related genes (Col1a1 and Col1a2). Immunostaining indicated co-localization of Col 1 with SA-forming astrocytic scars, but not with non-converting RAs even 14 days after injury. Consistently, cultured RAs showed close adhesion on Col 1 coated plates and increased GFAP expression (characteristic of SAs), but RAs retracted their processes and reduced GFAP expression when cultured on non-coated plates (Hara et al., 2017). Thus, expression of Col 1 in RAs appears to correlate with conversion of RAs into SAs and astrocytic scar tissues following SCI. Because astrocytic scars upregulated N-cadherin, which was distributed following astrocytic structures (Vázquez-Chona and Geisert, 1999; Takeichi, 2007; Tran et al., 2008), N-cadherin also appears to play a significant role of in inducing RA transformation into SAs (Hara et al., 2017).
Essential Roles of Type I Collagen-Integrin Interactions and N-Cadherin-Mediated Adhesion in Astrocytic Scar Formation
Recent experiments with time-dependent RNA-seq analysis supports that upregulation of ECM Col 1 is necessary for astrocytic scar formation (Hara et al., 2017). are essential to mediate cellF-ollowing SCI, pericytes and fibroblasts generated Col 1 in the lesion epicenter (Göritz et al., 2011; Cregg et al., 2014; DePaul et al., 2015). Pericytes attract other types of cells to the lesion area two weeks after SCI when the scar is compartmentalized and the lesion center is enclosed initially by an astrocytic layer derived from ependymal cells. Then, another astrocytic layer resulting from self-duplication of resident astrocytes further surrounds the lesion area (Barnabé-Heider et al., 2010; Göritz et al., 2011). Thus, the collagen-generating pericytes are essential in enclosing spinal cord lesions (Göritz et al., 2011). Similarly, pericytes in fibrotic kidney and dermal scars could differentiate into collagen-forming cells and also contributed to scarring formation in these organs (Sundberg et al., 1996; Humphreys et al., 2010).
As the transmembrane receptors, integrins are expressed in multiple cells in the CNS, including pericytes, neurons, glia and endothelial cells, and have multiple essential functions (del Zoppo and Milner, 2006). Integrins play important roles in regulating inflammation, growth cone motility, astrocyte proliferation, and axon guidance and regrowth after injury (Lemons and Condic, 2008). Integrins control collagen synthesis during cell proliferation (Gardner et al., 1999). Upregulation of integrins increases neuronal adhesion and outgrowth and reduces aggrecan-mediated inhibition of cell adhesion. Moreover, integrins maintain growth cone motility of neurons over a broad range of ligand concentrations and allow axons to invade different tissues during development and regeneration (Condic and Letourneau, 1997; Condic et al., 1999).
A number of studies indicate the involvement of integrins in astrocytic pathological changes. Astrocytes express various integrins, including α1β1, α2β1, α10β1 and α11β1 (Previtali et al., 1997; Yonezawa et al., 2010), and regulate cell functions by interacting with Col 1 (Hynes, 2002). Particularly, integrins contribute to induction of NAs to Ras (Avalos et al., 2002, 2004). After brain injury in mice, mRNA levels for integrins α1 and β1 and for GFAP were increased simultaneously in the endfeet of astrocytes encompassing blood vessels (Yonezawa et al., 2010). Pilocarpine-induced seizures increased integrin α1 and β1 immunoreactivity in RAs of rat brain (Fasen et al., 2003). In contrast, oxygen-glucose deprivation reduced α1 expressions in astrocytes of mice (Milner et al., 2008). In addition, integrins promote cancer cell motility and invasion with frequently altered levels by directly interacting with ECM components (Desgrosellier and Cheresh, 2010). Accordingly, altered expression of EMC molecules, including integrins, concurs with tumor advancement and elevated dissemination (Cavallaro and Christofori, 2004).
The cell adhesion molecules of cadherins are important to regulate growth of multiple cells, including astrocyte migration, scar formation and neuronal extension. Cadherins are cell surface glycoproteins that are essential to mediate cell-cell adhesion via calcium signaling (Takeichi, 2007). N-cadherin is an important adhesion molecule for astrocytic scar formation by stabilizing the contacts between RAs (Vázquez-Chona and Geisert, 1999). The expression levels of N-cadherin is finely tuned during reactive astrogliosis. Deletion of N-cadherin in astrocytes resulted in defects in astrocyte migration (Péglion and Etienne-Manneville, 2012; Kanemaru et al., 2013) and impaired transformation of RAs to SAs following CNS injury (Kanemaru et al., 2013). Upregulation of N-cadherin after SCI facilitates the process of reactive astrogliosis, which may isolate the damaged area from intact neural tissues (Fitch and Silver, 1997). As the neural associated glycoprotein, N-cadherin also facilitates cell interactions essential for neural growth because blockade with its antibodies substantially decreases the number of neurons initiating neurites and the length of neurites (Tomaselli et al., 1988; Dalseg et al., 1993). Moreover, N-cadherin-mediated adhesion contributes to migration behavior of cancer cells in glia-relevant tumors (Péglion and Etienne-Manneville, 2012).
The recent study by Hara et al. (2017) further supports the timing-dependent and functional relevance of Col1, integrin β1 and N-cadherin during astrogliosis after SCI. Cell adhesion of RAs concurred with regulation of N-cadherin and GFAP proteins. Treatment with an anti-β1 antibody blocked expression levels of N-cadherin and GFAP with scattered appearances. Accordingly, treatment with a N-cadherin-neutralizing antibody suppressed transformation of RAs into SAs. Moreover, the timing-dependent N-cadherin expression correlated well with observed cellular hypertrophy and process elongation of RAs and SAs (Hara et al., 2017). Because astrocytes formed N-cadherin-mediated adhesions and SAs exhibited elevated levels of N-cadherin (Vázquez-Chona and Geisert, 1999; Hara et al., 2017), the enhanced RA contacts mediated by N-cadherin appear important for astrogliosis by inducing RAs into SAs regulated through interactions between Col 1 and its receptor integrin β1.
Therapeutic Potential for CNS Regeneration by Reducing Astrogliosis
Because of complicated and sequential nature of astrogliosis, it is important to define detailed features of astrogliosis after CNS injury and to design effective therapies that target specific molecular and cellular changes at a given stage (Silver and Miller, 2004; Cafferty et al., 2008; Sharma et al., 2012). Various ligands/receptors and signaling pathways contribute to astrogliosis after CNS injury, including collagens, integrins, cadherins, JNK/c-Jun, STAT, Smads, MAPK, SOCs, and RhoA (Okada et al., 2006; Gadea et al., 2008; Herrmann et al., 2008; Sofroniew and Vinters, 2010; Kang and Hébert, 2011). This complexity indicates the vast range of interactions between reactive astrocytes and surrounding cells at acute, subacute and chronic phases. Accordingly, astrogliosis has both beneficial and detrimental functions largely depending on its dynamic structures and chemical components at different stages. Numerous studies have demonstrated the hindering effects of reactive scar tissues around lesion and attempted to promote axon regeneration by preventing scar formation with many molecular and cellular methods. However, Anderson et al. (2016) recently further studied function of reactive astrocytes after SCI using diverse cell ablation models and reported positive effects of reactive astrocytes on neural repair. By using transgenic mouse models that diminished production of reactive astrocytes and removed scar forming astrocytes at a chronic stage, Anderson et al. (2016) reported attenuated axon regeneration of descending and ascending tracts across the lesion in adult mice with SCI, indicating that the astrocytic scars around injury promoted axon regeneration, instead of blocking regrowth of injured axonal tracts.
Because a number of studies support that SAs are highly suppressive for axon elongation after CNS injury (Silver and Miller, 2004; Karimi-Abdolrezaee and Billakanti, 2012; Cregg et al., 2014), intervening transformation of RAs to SAs and minimizing scar formation can help injured axons grow and potentially improve functional recovery. Administering anti-β1 antibody 9–13 days after SCI significantly attenuated SA formation, downregulated both N-cadherin and GFAP, and reduced cell adhesion and scar formation around the lesion (Hara et al., 2017). Similarly, treatment with a N-cadherin antibody also decreased astrocytic scar formation. Importantly, anti-β1 Ab treatment increased the numbers of descending serotonin and tyrosine hydroxylase fibers in the caudal spinal cord and also appeared to improve behavioral recovery in mice with SCI. Thus, blocking Col 1-integrin β1 signaling pathway and/or N-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion may suppress scar formation and become an effective approach for providing axon regeneration after CNS injury.
Because JNK (c-Jun N-terminal kinase) signaling pathway appears to link Col 1-integrin interactions to N-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion in astrocytes (Shintani et al., 2006a, b; Hara et al., 2017), targeting JNK and N-cadherin pathways may also reduce scar formation and enhance regenerated axons to cross the lesion area after CSN injury. Stimulation of Col 1-integrin axis activates JNK signaling by increasing the levels of phosphorylated-JNK and N-cadherin in astrocytes after CNS injury (Vázquez-Chona and Geisert, 1999). Spinal nerve ligation injury increased expression of c-Jun, the substrate of JNK, and levels of phosphorylated c-Jun in GFAP+ cells of the ipsilateral spinal cord, indicating that peripheral axon injury activates JNK signal in spinal cord astrocytes (Raivich et al., 2004; Raivich and Makwana, 2007). In addition, JNK activation due to activating Col 1-integrin axis induced N-cadherin-dependent cell adhesion in other types of cells, including epithelial and cancer cells (Shintani et al., 2006a, b).
TGF-β/Smad signaling pathways contribute to scar formation and also appear the therapeutic targets (Lindholm et al., 1992; Gomes et al., 2005). TGF-β signaling regulates proliferation, differentiation and survival of many cells by activating Smad dependent or independent pathways. TGF-β acts as a major upstream activator of CSPG upregulation during astrogliosis. Although TGF-β treatment reduced lesion area after acute SCI by decreasing macrophage infiltration into the injury site, but TGF-β eventually stimulated CSPG production by astrocytes and fibroblasts and scarring tissue formation, inhibiting regeneration at subacute and chronic stages (Smith and Strunz, 2005; Schachtrup et al., 2010; Susarla et al., 2011). Blocking TGF-β/Smad2 signaling by TGF-β antibody and its receptor inhibitor, or inhibiting its upstream activator fibrinogen attenuated CSPGs generation and glial scar formation (Gris et al., 2007; Schachtrup et al., 2010). As the downstream signal of TGF-β, Smad2 appears to mediate scar gliosis by activating intrinsic transcriptional program in astrocytes. Inhibiting kinesin-dependent Smad2 translocation with taxol, a microtubule stabilizing agent, diminished scarring tissues around the lesion (Hellal et al., 2011).
As a transcription factor and a downstream signal for multiple cytokines and growth factors, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) mediates scar formation after CNS injury and may be a molecular target for CNS repair (Fitch and Silver, 1997; Silver and Miller, 2004; Okada et al., 2006; Herrmann et al., 2008). Deletion of STAT3 in conditional knockout mice with nestin-Cre caused failed astrocytic migration to the lesion site and exacerbated infiltration of inflammatory cells around the lesion after SCI. Conditional deletion of STAT3 from astrocytes downregulated GFAP expression and prevented astrocytic hypertrophy and astroglial scar formation after SCI (Okada et al., 2006; Herrmann et al., 2008). Also, conditional deletion of STAT3 from GFAP+ cells significantly blocked astrocyte development.
Several other signaling molecules also contribute to scar genesis and may become the therapeutic targets. SOX9 is essential for CSPGs expression after CNS injury probably by regulating xyloxyltransferase I and II during CSPG biosynthesis in astrocytes (Karimi-Abdolrezaee and Billakanti, 2012). As the downstream signaling molecules of integrins, focal adhesion kinase and Ras/Rho GTPases may also contribute to astrogliosis and CNS regeneration failure after CNS injury. Several studies have supported the crucial role of small GTPases in regulating neurite extension, axon regeneration and guidance (Hall and Nobes, 2000; Raftopoulou and Hall, 2004; Fu et al., 2007). In addition, the integrins-GTPases pathway may function as bi-directional signals by mediating upstream or downstream molecules during scar genesis (Schwartz and Shattil, 2000; Lemons and Condic, 2008).
Prospective
Recent studies have made tremendous progress in astrogliosis after CNS injuries, including identifying specific marker genes for different astrocyte subtypes, illustrating environment-dependent plasticity of reactive astrogliosis, and developing effective strategies for neural repair by targeting scar related mechanisms. Over the past decades, scientists have employed various approaches to minimize negative outcomes of astrogliosis (Pekny and Nilsson, 2005; Herrmann et al., 2008), to block scar-sourced inhibitory molecules genetically and pharmacologically (Bradbury et al., 2002; Fisher et al., 2011; Lang et al., 2015) to reduce upregulation of axon growth inhibitors, especially CSPGs (Grimpe and Silver, 2004; Rolls et al., 2008), to bridge lesion area with various cell/biomaterial transplants. For development of novel and highly effective therapies to repair injured CNS, it is important to further characterize diverse activities of different astrocyte subtypes, signaling control of scar formation, and the scar associated molecules, including markers, receptors and expression factors. Because astrogliosis is highly complicated and dynamic with the injury stages, it may have damaging, beneficial and mixed effects on neural recovery largely depending on the injury types, degrees, phases, location and other essential factors. It thus is important to develop specific strategies to target environment-dependent individual cellular and molecular mechanisms at a given stage, including the major signaling pathways of astrogliosis at upstream or downstream level. It is also interesting to formulate effective therapies by minimizing damaging outcomes and maximizing protective effects of reactive glial tissues by targeting individual molecules and cell types.
Alilain WJ, Horn KP, Hu H, Dick TE, Silver J. Functional regeneration of respiratory pathways after spinal cord injury Nature. 2011;475:196–200
Anderson MA, Burda JE, Ren Y, Ao Y, O’Shea TM, Kawaguchi R, Coppola G, Khakh BS, Deming TJ, Sofroniew MV. Astrocyte scar formation aids central nervous system axon regeneration Nature. 2016;532:195–200
Aubert I, Ridet JL, Gage FH. Regeneration in the adult mammalian CNS: guided by development Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995;5:625–635
Avalos AM, Labra CV, Quest AF, Leyton L. Signaling triggered by Thy-1 interaction with beta 3 integrin on astrocytes is an essential step towards unraveling neuronal Thy-1 function Biol Res. 2002;35:231–238
Avalos AM, Arthur WT, Schneider P, Quest AF, Burridge K, Leyton L. Aggregation of integrins and RhoA activation are required for Thy-1-induced morphological changes in astrocytes J Biol Chem. 2004;279:39139–39145
Barnabé-Heider F, Göritz C, Sabelstrom H, Takebayashi H, Pfrieger FW, Meletis K, Frisén J. Origin of new glial cells in intact and injured adult spinal cord Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7:470–482
Barrett CP, Guth L, Donati EJ, Krikorian JG. Astroglial reaction in the gray matter lumbar segments after midthoracic transection of the adult rat spinal cord Exp Neurol. 1981;73:365–377
Bradbury EJ, Moon LD, Popat RJ, King VR, Bennett GS, Patel PN, Fawcett JW, McMahon SB. Chondroitinase ABC promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury Nature. 2002;416:636–640
Brittis PA, Canning DR, Silver J. Chondroitin sulfate as a regulator of neuronal patterning in the retina Science. 1992;255:733–736
Brose K, Bland KS, Wang KH, Arnott D, Henzel W, Goodman CS, Tessier-Lavigne M, Kidd T. Slit proteins bind Robo receptors and have an evolutionarily conserved role in repulsive axon guidance Cell. 1999;96:795–806
Burda JE, Sofroniew MV. Reactive gliosis and the multicellular response to CNS damage and disease Neuron. 2014;81:229–248
Bush TG, Puvanachandra N, Horner CH, Polito A, Ostenfeld T, Svendsen CN, Mucke L, Johnson MH, Sofroniew MV. Leukocyte infiltration, neuronal degeneration, and neurite outgrowth after ablation of scar-forming, reactive astrocytes in adult transgenic mice Neuron. 1999;23:297–308
Bushong EA, Martone ME, Jones YZ, Ellisman MH. Protoplasmic astrocytes in CA1 stratum radiatum occupy separate anatomical domains J Neurosci. 2002;22:183–192
Cafferty WB, McGee AW, Strittmatter SM. Axonal growth therapeutics: regeneration or sprouting or plasticity Trends Neurosci. 2008;31:215–220
Cahoy JD, Emery B, Kaushal A, Foo LC, Zamanian JL, Christopherson KS, Xing Y, Lubischer JL, Krieg PA, Krupenko SA, Thompson WJ, Barres BA. A transcriptome database for astrocytes, neurons, and oligodendrocytes: a new resource for understanding brain development and function J Neurosci. 2008;28:264–278
Cavallaro U, Christofori G. Cell adhesion and signalling by cadherins and Ig-CAMs in cancer Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:118
Condic ML, Letourneau PC. Ligand-induced changes in integrin expression regulate neuronal adhesion and neurite outgrowth Nature. 1997;389:852–856
Condic ML, Snow DM, Letourneau PC. Embryonic neurons adapt to the inhibitory proteoglycan aggrecan by increasing integrin expression J Neurosci. 1999;19:10036–10043
Cregg JM, DePaul MA, Filous AR, Lang BT, Tran A, Silver J. Functional regeneration beyond the glial scar Exp Neurol. 2014;253:197–207
Dalseg AM, Gaardsvoll H, Bock E. Molecular biology of cadherins in the nervous system Mol Neurobiol. 1993;7:207–228
Davies SJ, Fitch MT, Memberg SP, Hall AK, Raisman G, Silver J. Regeneration of adult axons in white matter tracts of the central nervous system Nature. 1997;390:680–683
del Zoppo GJ, Milner R. Integrin-matrix interactions in the cerebral microvasculature Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:1966–1975
DePaul MA, Lin CY, Silver J, Lee YS. Peripheral nerve transplantation combined with acidic fibroblast growth factor and chondroitinase induces regeneration and improves urinary function in complete spinal cord transected adult mice PLoS One. 2015;10:e0139335
Desgrosellier JS, Cheresh DA. Integrins in cancer: biological implications and therapeutic opportunities Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:9–22
Doyle JP, Dougherty JD, Heiman M, Schmidt EF, Stevens TR, Ma G, Bupp S, Shrestha P, Shah RD, Doughty ML, Gong S, Greengard P, Heintz N. Application of a translational profiling approach for the comparative analysis of CNS cell types Cell. 2008;135:749–762
Eddleston M, Mucke L. Molecular profile of reactive astrocytes--implications for their role in neurologic disease Neuroscience. 1993;54:15–36
Ellis V, Behrendt N, Danø K. Plasminogen activation by receptor-bound urokinase. A kinetic study with both cell-associated and isolated receptor J Biol Chem. 1991;266:12752–12758
Fasen K, Elger CE, Lie AA. Distribution of alpha and beta integrin subunits in the adult rat hippocampus after pilocarpine-induced neuronal cell loss, axonal reorganization and reactive astrogliosis Acta Neuropathol. 2003;106:319–322
Faulkner JR, Herrmann JE, Woo MJ, Tansey KE, Doan NB, Sofroniew MV. Reactive astrocytes protect tissue and preserve function after spinal cord injury J Neurosci. 2004;24:2143–2155
Fawcett JW. Overcoming inhibition in the damaged spinal cord J Neurotrauma. 2006;23:371–383
Fawcett JW, Asher RA. The glial scar and central nervous system repair Brain Res Bull. 1999;49:377–391
Fisher D, Xing B, Dill J, Li H, Hoang HH, Zhao Z, Yang XL, Bachoo R, Cannon S, Longo FM, Sheng M, Silver J, Li S. Leukocyte common antigen-related phosphatase is a functional receptor for chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan axon growth inhibitors J Neurosci. 2011;31:14051–14066
Fitch MT, Silver J. Glial cell extracellular matrix: boundaries for axon growth in development and regeneration Cell Tissue Res. 1997;290:379–384
Fu H, Cai J, Clevers H, Fast E, Gray S, Greenberg R, Jain MK, Ma Q, Qiu M, Rowitch DH, Taylor CM, Stiles CD. A genome-wide screen for spatially restricted expression patterns identifies transcription factors that regulate glial development J Neurosci. 2009;29:11399–11408
Fu Q, Hue J, Li S. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs promote axon regeneration via RhoA inhibition J Neurosci. 2007;27:4154–4164
Göritz C, Dias DO, Tomilin N, Barbacid M, Shupliakov O, Frisen J. A pericyte origin of spinal cord scar tissue Science. 2011;333:238–242
Gadea A, Schinelli S, Gallo V. Endothelin-1 regulates astrocyte proliferation and reactive gliosis via a JNK/c-Jun signaling pathway J Neurosci. 2008;28:2394–2408
Gardner H, Broberg A, Pozzi A, Laato M, Heino J. Absence of integrin alpha1beta1 in the mouse causes loss of feedback regulation of collagen synthesis in normal and wounded dermis J Cell Sci. 1999;112(Pt 3):263–272
Gomes FC, Sousa Vde O, Romão L. Emerging roles for TGF-beta1 in nervous system development Int J Dev Neurosci. 2005;23:413–424
Grimpe B, Silver J. A novel DNA enzyme reduces glycosaminoglycan chains in the glial scar and allows microtransplanted dorsal root ganglia axons to regenerate beyond lesions in the spinal cord J Neurosci. 2004;24:1393–1397
Gris P, Tighe A, Levin D, Sharma R, Brown A. Transcriptional regulation of scar gene expression in primary astrocytes Glia. 2007;55:1145–1155
Hagino S, Iseki K, Mori T, Zhang Y, Hikake T, Yokoya S, Takeuchi M, Hasimoto H, Kikuchi S, Wanaka A. Slit and glypican-1 mRNAs are coexpressed in the reactive astrocytes of the injured adult brain Glia. 2003;42:130–138
Hall A, Nobes CD. Rho GTPases: molecular switches that control the organization and dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000;355:965–970
Hara M, Kobayakawa K, Ohkawa Y, Kumamaru H, Yokota K, Saito T, Kijima K, Yoshizaki S, Harimaya K, Nakashima Y, Okada S. Interaction of reactive astrocytes with type I collagen induces astrocytic scar formation through the integrin-N-cadherin pathway after spinal cord injury Nat Med. 2017;23:818–828
Hellal F, Hurtado A, Ruschel J, Flynn KC, Laskowski CJ, Umlauf M, Kapitein LC, Strikis D, Lemmon V, Bixby J, Hoogenraad CC, Bradke F. Microtubule stabilization reduces scarring and causes axon regeneration after spinal cord injury Science. 2011;331:928–931
Hernandez MR, Agapova OA, Yang P, Salvador-Silva M, Ricard CS, Aoi S. Differential gene expression in astrocytes from human normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head analyzed by cDNA microarray Glia. 2002;38:45–64
Herrmann JE, Imura T, Song B, Qi J, Ao Y, Nguyen TK, Korsak RA, Takeda K, Akira S, Sofroniew MV. STAT3 is a critical regulator of astrogliosis and scar formation after spinal cord injury J Neurosci. 2008;28:7231–7243
Humphreys BD, Lin SL, Kobayashi A, Hudson TE, Nowlin BT, Bonventre JV, Valerius MT, McMahon AP, Duffield JS. Fate tracing reveals the pericyte and not epithelial origin of myofibroblasts in kidney fibrosis Am J Pathol. 2010;176:85–97
Hynes RO. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines Cell. 2002;110:673–687
Kakinuma Y, Hama H, Sugiyama F, Yagami K, Goto K, Murakami K, Fukamizu A. Impaired blood-brain barrier function in angiotensinogen-deficient mice Nat Med. 1998;4:1078–1080
Kanemaru K, Kubota J, Sekiya H, Hirose K, Okubo Y, Iino M. Calcium-dependent N-cadherin up-regulation mediates reactive astrogliosis and neuroprotection after brain injury Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:11612–11617
Kang W, Hébert JM. Signaling pathways in reactive astrocytes, a genetic perspective Mol Neurobiol. 2011;43:147–154
Karimi-Abdolrezaee S, Billakanti R. Reactive astrogliosis after spinal cord injury-beneficial and detrimental effects Mol Neurobiol. 2012;46:251–264
Kawaja MD, Gage FH. Reactive astrocytes are substrates for the growth of adult CNS axons in the presence of elevated levels of nerve growth factor Neuron. 1991;7:1019–1030
Kumamaru H, Ohkawa Y, Saiwai H, Yamada H, Kubota K, Kobayakawa K, Akashi K, Okano H, Iwamoto Y, Okada S. Direct isolation and RNA-seq reveal environment-dependent properties of engrafted neural stem/progenitor cells Nat Commun. 2012;3:1140
Lang BT, Cregg JM, DePaul MA, Tran AP, Xu K, Dyck SM, Madalena KM, Brown BP, Weng YL, Li S, Karimi-Abdolrezaee S, Busch SA, Shen Y, Silver J. Modulation of the proteoglycan receptor PTPsigma promotes recovery after spinal cord injury Nature. 2015;518:404–408
Lemons ML, Condic ML. Integrin signaling is integral to regeneration Exp Neurol. 2008;209:343–352
Lengyel E, Wang H, Stepp E, Juarez J, Wang Y, Doe W, Pfarr CM, Boyd D. Requirement of an upstream AP-1 motif for the constitutive and phorbol ester-inducible expression of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor gene J Biol Chem. 1996;271:23176–23184
Li Y, Raisman G. Sprouts from cut corticospinal axons persist in the presence of astrocytic scarring in long-term lesions of the adult rat spinal cord Exp Neurol. 1995;134:102–111
Liang Y, Annan RS, Carr SA, Popp S, Mevissen M, Margolis RK, Margolis RU. Mammalian homologues of the Drosophila slit protein are ligands of the heparan sulfate proteoglycan glypican-1 in brain J Biol Chem. 1999;274:17885–17892
Liedtke W, Edelmann W, Bieri PL, Chiu FC, Cowan NJ, Kucherlapati R, Raine CS. GFAP is necessary for the integrity of CNS white matter architecture and long-term maintenance of myelination Neuron. 1996;17:607–615
Lindholm D, Castrén E, Kiefer R, Zafra F, Thoenen H. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 in the rat brain: increase after injury and inhibition of astrocyte proliferation J Cell Biol. 1992;117:395–400
Liu K, Tedeschi A, Park KK, He Z. Neuronal intrinsic mechanisms of axon regeneration Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011;34:131–152
Margolis RK, Margolis RU. Nervous tissue proteoglycans EXS. 1994;70:145–177
McCall MA, Gregg RG, Behringer RR, Brenner M, Delaney CL, Galbreath EJ, Zhang CL, Pearce RA, Chiu SY, Messing A. Targeted deletion in astrocyte intermediate filament (Gfap) alters neuronal physiology Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:6361–6366
McKeon RJ, Schreiber RC, Rudge JS, Silver J. Reduction of neurite outgrowth in a model of glial scarring following CNS injury is correlated with the expression of inhibitory molecules on reactive astrocytes J Neurosci. 1991;11:3398–3411
McKillop WM, Dragan M, Schedl A, Brown A. Conditional Sox9 ablation reduces chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan levels and improves motor function following spinal cord injury Glia. 2013;61:164–177
Merrill JE, Benveniste EN. Cytokines in inflammatory brain lesions: helpful and harmful Trends Neurosci. 1996;19:331–338
Milner R, Hung S, Wang X, Berg GI, Spatz M, del Zoppo GJ. Responses of endothelial cell and astrocyte matrix-integrin receptors to ischemia mimic those observed in the neurovascular unit Stroke. 2008;39:191–197
Molofsky AV, Krencik R, Ullian EM, Tsai HH, Deneen B, Richardson WD, Barres BA, Rowitch DH. Astrocytes and disease: a neurodevelopmental perspective Genes Dev. 2012;26:891–907
Nedergaard M, Ransom B, Goldman SA. New roles for astrocytes: redefining the functional architecture of the brain Trends Neurosci. 2003;26:523–530
Ohtake Y, Li S. Molecular mechanisms of scar-sourced axon growth inhibitors Brain Res. 2015;1619:22–35
Okada S, Nakamura M, Katoh H, Miyao T, Shimazaki T, Ishii K, Yamane J, Yoshimura A, Iwamoto Y, Toyama Y, Okano H. Conditional ablation of Stat3 or Socs3 discloses a dual role for reactive astrocytes after spinal cord injury Nat Med. 2006;12:829–834
Péglion F, Etienne-Manneville S. N-cadherin expression level as a critical indicator of invasion in non-epithelial tumors Cell Adh Migr. 2012;6:327–332
Pekny M, Nilsson M. Astrocyte activation and reactive gliosis Glia. 2005;50:427–434
Pekny M, Levéen P, Pekna M, Eliasson C, Berthold CH, Westermark B, Betsholtz C. Mice lacking glial fibrillary acidic protein display astrocytes devoid of intermediate filaments but develop and reproduce normally EMBO J. 1995;14:1590–1598
Pekny M, Johansson CB, Eliasson C, Stakeberg J, Wallen A, Perlmann T, Lendahl U, Betsholtz C, Berthold CH, Frisén J. Abnormal reaction to central nervous system injury in mice lacking glial fibrillary acidic protein and vimentin J Cell Biol. 1999;145:503–514
Pellerin L, Bouzier-Sore AK, Aubert A, Serres S, Merle M, Costalat R, Magistretti PJ. Activity-dependent regulation of energy metabolism by astrocytes: an update Glia. 2007;55:1251–1262
Previtali SC, Archelos JJ, Hartung HP. Modulation of the expression of integrins on glial cells during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. A central role for TNF-alpha Am J Pathol. 1997;151:1425–1435
Pringle NP, Yu WP, Howell M, Colvin JS, Ornitz DM, Richardson WD. Fgfr3 expression by astrocytes and their precursors: evidence that astrocytes and oligodendrocytes originate in distinct neuroepithelial domains Development. 2003;130:93–102
Raftopoulou M, Hall A. Cell migration: Rho GTPases lead the way Dev Biol. 2004;265:23–32
Raivich G, Makwana M. The making of successful axonal regeneration: genes, molecules and signal transduction pathways Brain Res Rev. 2007;53:287–311
Raivich G, Bohatschek M, Da Costa C, Iwata O, Galiano M, Hristova M, Nateri AS, Makwana M, Riera-Sans L, Wolfer DP, Lipp HP, Aguzzi A, Wagner EF, Behrens A. The AP-1 transcription factor c-Jun is required for efficient axonal regeneration Neuron. 2004;43:57–67
Ridet JL, Malhotra SK, Privat A, Gage FH. Reactive astrocytes: cellular and molecular cues to biological function Trends Neurosci. 1997;20:570–577
Rolls A, Shechter R, London A, Segev Y, Jacob-Hirsch J, Amariglio N, Rechavi G, Schwartz M. Two faces of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan in spinal cord repair: a role in microglia/macrophage activation PLoS Med. 2008;5:e171
Ronca F, Andersen JS, Paech V, Margolis RU. Characterization of Slit protein interactions with glypican-1 J Biol Chem. 2001;276:29141–29147
Rowitch DH, Kriegstein AR. Developmental genetics of vertebrate glial-cell specification Nature. 2010;468:214–222
Rutishauser U, Landmesser L. Polysialic acid in the vertebrate nervous system: a promoter of plasticity in cell-cell interactions Trends Neurosci. 1996;19:422–427
Schachtrup C, Ryu JK, Helmrick MJ, Vagena E, Galanakis DK, Degen JL, Margolis RU, Akassoglou K. Fibrinogen triggers astrocyte scar formation by promoting the availability of active TGF-beta after vascular damage J Neurosci. 2010;30:5843–5854
Schwartz MA, Shattil SJ. Signaling networks linking integrins and rho family GTPases Trends Biochem Sci. 2000;25:388–391
Seifert G, Schilling K, Steinhäuser C. Astrocyte dysfunction in neurological disorders: a molecular perspective Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:194–206
Sharma K, Selzer ME, Li S. Scar-mediated inhibition and CSPG receptors in the CNS Exp Neurol. 2012;237:370–378
Shintani Y, Wheelock MJ, Johnson KR. Phosphoinositide-3 kinase-Rac1-c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase signaling mediates collagen I-induced cell scattering and up-regulation of N-cadherin expression in mouse mammary epithelial cells Mol Biol Cell. 2006a;17:2963–2975
Shintani Y, Hollingsworth MA, Wheelock MJ, Johnson KR. Collagen I promotes metastasis in pancreatic cancer by activating c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase 1 and up-regulating N-cadherin expression Cancer Res. 2006b;66:11745–11753
Silver J, Miller JH. Regeneration beyond the glial scar Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:146–156
Sivron T, Schwartz M. Glial cell types, lineages, and response to injury in rat and fish: implications for regeneration Glia. 1995;13:157–165
Smith GM, Strunz C. Growth factor and cytokine regulation of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans by astrocytes Glia. 2005;52:209–218
Sofroniew MV. Molecular dissection of reactive astrogliosis and glial scar formation Trends Neurosci. 2009;32:638–647
Sofroniew MV. Astrogliosis Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;7:a020420
Sofroniew MV, Vinters HV. Astrocytes: biology and pathology Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119:7–35
Stolt CC, Lommes P, Sock E, Chaboissier MC, Schedl A, Wegner M. The Sox9 transcription factor determines glial fate choice in the developing spinal cord Genes Dev. 2003;17:1677–1689
Sundberg C, Ivarsson M, Gerdin B, Rubin K. Pericytes as collagen-producing cells in excessive dermal scarring Lab Invest. 1996;74:452–466
Susarla BT, Laing ED, Yu P, Katagiri Y, Geller HM, Symes AJ. Smad proteins differentially regulate transforming growth factor-beta-mediated induction of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans J Neurochem. 2011;119:868–878
Takeichi M. The cadherin superfamily in neuronal connections and interactions Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:11–20
Takeuchi K, Yoshioka N, Higa Onaga S, Watanabe Y, Miyata S, Wada Y, Kudo C, Okada M, Ohko K, Oda K, Sato T, Yokoyama M, Matsushita N, Nakamura M, Okano H, Sakimura K, Kawano H, Kitagawa H, Igarashi M. Chondroitin sulphate N-acetylgalactosaminyl-transferase-1 inhibits recovery from neural injury Nat Commun. 2013;4:2740
Tomaselli KJ, Neugebauer KM, Bixby JL, Lilien J, Reichardt LF. N-cadherin and integrins: two receptor systems that mediate neuronal process outgrowth on astrocyte surfaces Neuron. 1988;1:33–43
Tower DB, Young OM. The activities of butyrylcholinesterase and carbonic anhydrase, the rate of anaerobic glycolysis, and the question of a constant density of glial cells in cerebral cortices of various mammalian species from mouse to whale J Neurochem. 1973;20:269–278
Tran MD, Wanner IB, Neary JT. Purinergic receptor signaling regulates N-cadherin expression in primary astrocyte cultures J Neurochem. 2008;105:272–286
Vázquez-Chona F, Geisert EE Jr. N-cadherin at the glial scar in the rat Brain Res. 1999;838:45–50
Vaughn JE, Pease DC. Electron microscopy of classically stained astrocytes J Comp Neurol. 1967;131:143–154
Wilhelmsson U, Bushong EA, Price DL, Smarr BL, Phung V, Terada M, Ellisman MH, Pekny M. Redefining the concept of reactive astrocytes as cells that remain within their unique domains upon reaction to injury Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:17513–17518
Wu DY, Schneider GE, Silver J, Poston M, Jhaveri S. A role for tectal midline glia in the unilateral containment of retinocollicular axons J Neurosci. 1998;18:8344–8355
Yokota K, Kobayakawa K, Kubota K, Miyawaki A, Okano H, Ohkawa Y, Iwamoto Y, Okada S. Engrafted Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells Promote Functional Recovery through Synapse Reorganization with Spared Host Neurons after Spinal Cord Injury Stem Cell Reports. 2015;5:264–277
Yonezawa T, Hattori S, Inagaki J, Kurosaki M, Takigawa T, Hirohata S, Miyoshi T, Ninomiya Y. Type IV collagen induces expression of thrombospondin-1 that is mediated by integrin alpha1beta1 in astrocytes Glia. 2010;58:755–767
Conflicts of interest:None declared.
Plagiarism check:Checked twice by iThenticate.
Peer review:Externally peer reviewed.
Funding:This work was supported by research grants to SL from NIH (1R01NS079432 and 1R01EY024575) and Shriners Research Foundation (SHC-86300-PHI, SHC-86200-PHI-16 and SHC-85100).
Keywords:
astrogliosis; astrocyte fate; scar formation; spinal cord injury; axon regeneration; environment cue; collagen I; integrin β1
FAQs
Can astrocytes regenerate? ›
Astrocytes and OLs are able to regenerate in response to CNS injury, and glial regeneration and repair are essential for long-term homeostasis and for complete recovery of integrated functions.
How do you determine astrocytes? ›Markers for mature astrocytes include aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1 member L1 (Aldh1L1), aldolase C (AldoC), glutamate transporter-1 (Glt1), S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100b) and Aquaporin 4. Two types of astrocytes are currently recognized, although morphological studies suggest a greater diversity.
What causes astrocytes to become reactive? ›Astrocytes become reactive in response to virtually all pathological conditions in the central nervous system (CNS), both following acute injuries (stroke, trauma) and during progressive diseases (tumors, epilepsy and ND see Box 1 and Table 1). Astrocyte reactivity is observed in many mammalian and bird species.
What would happen if astrocytes were destroyed or become dysfunctional? ›In particular, the loss of astrocytes function as a result of cellular senescence could have implications for the neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer disease and Huntington disease, and for the aging brain.
Can damaged neurons be replaced by astrocytes? ›More recent work in mice has shown that astrocytes, a common type of support cell in the brain that help keep neurons healthy, could also generate new neurons following a stroke. However, the ability was restricted to small numbers of astrocytes in a specific part of the brain.
How do astrocytes repair neurons? ›Nervous system repair: Upon injury to nerve cells within the central nervous system, astrocytes fill up the space to form a glial scar, and may contribute to neural repair. The role of astrocytes in CNS regeneration following injury is not well understood though.
What is the best marker for astrocytes? ›Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is the most commonly used astrocytic marker, but as the major intermediate filament composing cytoskeleton, GFAP immunolabeled only about 15% of the total astrocyte volume [6], and more than 40% of astrocytes were found to be GFAP-negative in the adult rat hippocampus [7].
What are the biomarkers for astrocytes? ›Our results suggest that the two most widely used reactive astrocyte biomarkers, CSF GFAP and YKL-40, are differently associated with AD pathophysiological hallmarks in living humans. While GFAP levels mainly reflect a response to Aβ pathology, YKL-40 levels mainly reflect a response to tau pathology.
What is the marker for activated astrocytes? ›Astrocyte markers. Glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP). Glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP) is one of the widely recognized astrocyte markers, which is the major intermediate filament protein found in mature astrocytes and crucial cytoskeletal constituent in the developing astrocytes [14].
What happens when astrocytes are activated? ›Another major function of these astrocytes involves their activation in response to damage. Astrocyte activation, or astrogliosis, plays a central role in the response to most or all neurological insults including trauma, infections, stroke, tumorigenesis, neurodegeneration, and epilepsy.
How are astrocytes damaged? ›
Astrocytes are less vulnerable than neurons to ischemic injury but they are damaged if there is lactic acidosis. Such damage causes intracellular fluid accumulation (cytotoxic edema). Cytotoxic edema involves the cerebral cortex, whereas vasogenic edema is more pronounced in the white matter.
What would happen if we didn't have astrocytes? ›Pretty much everything happening in the brain would fail without astrocytes. These star-shaped glial cells are known to have a critical role in synapse creation, nervous tissue repair, and the formation of the blood-brain barrier.
Can neurons survive without astrocytes? ›Astrocytes are required for neuronal survival (Wagner et al. 2006), and the loss of normal astrocyte function can be a primary contributor to neurodegeneration (Brenner et al.
What are 5 important functions of astrocytes? ›Functions of astrocytes include physical and metabolic support for neurons, detoxification, guidance during migration, regulation of energy metabolism, electrical insulation (for unmyelinated axons), transport of blood-borne material to the neuron, and reaction to injury.
How do you increase astrocytes in the brain? ›Physical exercise promotes the astrocytic proliferation, astrocytic transporter levels, and interaction between glial cells and neurons. These effects help to increase the number of synapses, neural structures, and pre- and postsynaptic receptor localization.
Can a neuron regenerate if damaged? ›Injured nerve cells in the central nervous system typically do not regenerate. However, this part of the nervous system can reorganize in response to an injury. This is called "plasticity." Luckily, the brain has a lot of built-in redundancy.
Do astrocytes promote recovery after injury? ›However, astrocytes are also capable of producing factors to support repair and regeneration after CNS damage (Kim et al., 2010; Madathil et al., 2013).
Can neurons be repaired or regenerated? ›Most of your neurons can't be replaced. Other parts of your body -- such as skin and bone -- can be replaced by the body growing new cells, but when you injure your neurons, you can't just grow new ones; instead, the existing cells have to repair themselves.
What is the role of astrocytes in neurogenesis? ›In the mammalian brain, highly specialized astrocytes serve as neural stem cells (NSCs) that divide and give rise to new neurons, in a process called neurogenesis. During embryonic development NSCs generate almost all neurons of the brain.
Do astrocytes control the chemical environment around neurons? ›Astrocytes are star-shaped cells that maintain a neuron's working environment. They do this by controlling the levels of neurotransmitter around synapses, controlling the concentrations of important ions like potassium, and providing metabolic support.
Do astrocytes repair? ›
Astrocytes comprise a heterogeneous cell population that plays a complex role in repair after spinal cord injury. Reactive astrocytes are major contributors to the glial scar that is a physical and chemical barrier to axonal regeneration.
What is the most important function of the astrocyte? ›The broad role of astrocytes is to maintain brain homeostasis and neuronal metabolism. It's hypothesized that the “star-shape” supports the neurons and creates the microarchitecture of the brain parenchyma illustrating that form-follows-function rule seen across biology.
What is GFAP staining used for? ›Immunoperoxidase staining for GFAP produces intense cytoplasmic staining of astrocytes, glial cells, and ependymal cells in normal brain. In neoplastic tissues, GFAP is useful for the identification of glial tumors such as astrocytomas and ependymomas.
What are the two functions of astrocytes? ›Astrocytes not only regulate blood flow, but also transfer mitochondria to neurons, and supply the building blocks of neurotransmitters, which fuel neuronal metabolism [2,11,57].
What does GFAP do in astrocytes? ›GFAP is the key type III intermediate filament in astrocytes. It is responsible for maintaining the mechanical strength and the thickening and elongation of astrocytic processes during ac- tivation in response to CNS injury, which is known as astrogliosis.
Is GFAP a marker for astrocytes? ›Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is one of the best markers for the activation of astrocytes (AS) following injury or stress in the central nervous system (CNS).
What does S100B mark? ›We show here, that S100B is a late marker of astrocyte development being expressed long after GFAP and characterizing a mature stage. By taking advantage of s100b-EGFP transgenic mice, we demonstrate that the onset of S100B expression in astrocytes is associated with the loss of their potential to form neurospheres.
What is GFAP stain astrocytes? ›Immunohistochemical staining for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is standard for visualization of reactive astrocytes in tissue sections, whereas various forms of astrocytic damage remain to be described in detail.
What is the role of K+ channels in astrocytes? ›The two K2P channels mutually regulate the surface expression of each other by heterodimerization in hippocampal astrocytes [32,33,38]. The inhibition of channel activity by inhibitors or gene silencing reduces most but not all of the passive conductance.
What GFAP detects? ›Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a discriminative blood biomarker for many neurological diseases, such as traumatic brain injury. Detection of GFAP in buffer solutions using biosensors has been demonstrated, but accurate quantification of GFAP in patient samples has not been reported, yet in urgent need.
How do astrocytes develop? ›
Astrocytes arise from a number of various sources in the developing nervous system; they may be produced directly from radial glia [9], from a yet-to-be-identified astrocyte-restricted progenitor population, or from the proliferation of newly born astrocytes.
Do glial cells repair damage? ›Unlike the brain and spinal cord, the peripheral nervous system has an astonishing capacity for regeneration following injury.